Hi,
The report was obtained after running fastqc on my data. However after
looking at the report statistics, the
Quality is not good in the Per Base Sequence Quality and there is a
difference between the mean and median at each cycle. How can the
quality be improved? And why is there a difference between the mean
and median in the fastqc report at each cycle?
Benjy
Benjamin Osei-agyeman <benjy_osei@yahoo.co.uk>;
To:
Ido Tamir <tamir@imp.ac.at>;
Cc:
<galaxy-user@lists.bx.psu.edu>;
Subject:
Re: [galaxy-user] Quality report
Wed, Nov 6, 2013 5:31:22 PM
The report was obtained after running fastqc on my data, I found out
that the quality of the report is not good and that the mean and
median are different at each cycle. Please how can the difference
between the mean and median be improved as well as improving the
overall quality
Ido Tamir <tamir@imp.ac.at>;
To:
Benjamin Osei-agyeman <benjy_osei@yahoo.co.uk>;
Cc:
<galaxy-user@lists.bx.psu.edu>;
Subject:
Re: [galaxy-user] Quality report
Wed, Nov 6, 2013 4:38:15 PM
Please be more specific about which quality of what gets reported.
Why do you think its important to reduce the difference between mean
and median?
best,
ido
Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
mailing lists use the unified search at: